Complexity Economics

Are We Facing a New Collapse?

bigstock_collapse_of_turnover_6283848
Another collapse?

A quick look at the resilience of the major indices on December 19-th, 2014. The analysis is performed on a daily basis, we report the situation we have registered after the markets closed yesterday.

EU:

FTSE.MIB – 63.7%

SSMI – 81.5%

FTSE – 64.5%

CAC40 – 44.6%

DAX30 – 76.3%

 

Asia:

HSI – 68.9%

STI – 73%

 

USA:

NASDAQ100 – 63.7%

DJA – 75.3%

DJI – 74.1%

S&P – 73.7%

 

Finally, a look at the entire global financial system, via the Global Financial Resilience Index (GFRI). The GFRI is a meta-index, i.e. an ‘index of indices’, which measures the resilience of the global financial system based on the daily values of the indices composing it. Essential to the global investor, the GFRI measures the ‘financial temperature’ of the entire international  financial system, in particular its ability to absorb shocks, contagion or other destabilising events.

GFRI (Global Financial Resilience Index):

GFRI – 62.2%

 

An interactive Complexity Map of the GFRI may be navigated here.

The low value of 62.2% points to a system which is not well equipped to absorb shocks. By examining the resilience measures of the various indices one would not expect that an ensemble of markets with relatively high resilience (with the exception of the CAC40) would yield such low resilience when analyzed as a system. In fact, while the US and Asian indices are pretty much close to a reassuring 70%, it is the EU that shows values which scattere from 44% to over 80%. This clearly points to the EU as being, today, the weak link in the chain. Moreover, the degree of interdependency of the global financial system is 56%. That is high. What it means that contagion, if any, will propagate fast.

The fundamental message, once again, is this: don’t think that a system of apparently healthy components must necessarily be healty. This is easy to explain. What makes a system sometimes difficult to understand (and govern) are the interactions between its components. In the GFRI we take into account 39 of the World’s major markets. The number of interactions between these 39 indices today is 294! Does anyone ever study them all? Besides, tomorrow this number will certainly change.  The conclusion is one. In a fast, non-stationry, turbulent (and crippled) economy, predictions are futile. One should focus on studying the dynamics of the system as a whole, try to understand it and identify any potential concentrations of fragility.

 

www.assetdyne.com

Established originally in 2005 in the USA, Ontonix is a technology company headquartered in Como, Italy. The unusual technology and solutions developed by Ontonix focus on countering what most threatens safety, advanced products, critical infrastructures, or IT network security - the rapid growth of complexity. In 2007 the company received recognition by being selected as Gartner's Cool Vendor. What makes Ontonix different from all those companies and research centers who claim to manage complexity is that we have a complexity metric. This means that we MEASURE complexity. We detect anomalies in complex defense systems without using Machine Learning for one very good reason: our clients don’t have the luxury of multiple examples of failures necessary to teach software to recognize them. We identify anomalies without having seen them before. Sometimes, you must get it right the first and only time!

0 comments on “Are We Facing a New Collapse?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: